Articles for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

This article is primarily intended for younger males – What NOT to Do When Stopped by the Police!

Saturday, April 30th, 2011

by John Cashman

This article is primarily intended for younger males. Like it or not, and regardless of whether it’s fair, these are the drivers that primarily catch the attention of police officers. Your chance of being stopped is already elevated, so please don’t make the job of the officer unreasonably simple, or make the job of your defense attorney more difficult than necessary.

 

  1. Check the equipment on your vehicle before hitting the road, especially if you will be driving late at night. Generally, there are fewer cars on the road per officer at night, so you are begging to be stopped if you also have a headlight, taillight, license plate light, etc., that is not in compliance with the law. This just makes it too easy for the officer to stop you. He sees it as an easy opportunity to look in your car to see if anything more interesting might be going on.
  2. Don’t immediately begin complaining to the officer that you were only stopped because you are white/black/Asian/Hispanic/etc. This will only serve to ensure the officer cites you for all violations he observes to cover himself should you file a complaint. It is also just a bad idea to start the conversation by challenging an officer’s authority. The bottom line is that the officer has a tremendous amount of discretion and you don’t appear to be worthy of leniency when you start off by challenging him.
  3. Don’t ever give the officer permission to search your person or vehicle. If you say “yes,” you are putting your head on the chopping block and hoping it doesn’t get cut off. You are always better off saying “no” in this situation. The officer may still conduct a search, but if he finds anything he will have to document a legally sufficient reason for searching without your consent. This is the first thing your defense attorney will look at in hopes of arguing the search was illegal.

If all of my clients lived by these simple rules it would make the job of their defense attorney much easier.

Texas Criminal Law Attorneys

Texas Criminal Law Attorneys | http://www.baileygalyencriminallaw.com/

When you turn to Bailey & Galyen, a criminal defense attorney will fully explain the charges filed against you, the penalties and the legal process involved in your case. We guide you each step of the way, effectively and efficiently, striving for the best outcome possible.

When you are charged with a crime or learn you are under investigation in a criminal activity, immediate legal advice can make a difference in your outcome. Call our office at 877-345-6767 to speak to an experienced criminal defense lawyer.

 

Warrantless GPS Tracking of Vehicles

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

A recent opinion by the D.C. Circuit has highlighted the issue of whether a warrant is required to attach a GPS monitoring device to a suspect’s vehicle. In United States v. Maynard, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16417 (D.C. Cir. August 6, 2010), the Court held that extended tracking of a vehicle does constitute a search and does require a warrant. The Court distinguished a prior U.S. Supreme Court case, United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), finding that it reserved the issue of whether prolonged monitoring constitutes an impermissible warrantless search.

This holding is in stark contrast to a Ninth Circuit case earlier this year. In United States v. Pineda-Moreno, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS (9th Cir. January 11, 2010), the agents attached the device while the vehicle was parked in the driveway of the Defendant’s home. The Court held that the Defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a vehicle parked in his driveway – which the Court characterized as a “semi-private” area. In addition, the Court held that no search had occurred by tracking the vehicle’s movements on public streets, because this was “information the agents could have obtained by following the car.” Although citing Knotts, the Court never addressed the distinction between limited and prolonged monitoring of the vehicle’s movements.

The split between the circuits on this issue, coupled with a possible misinterpretation of prior precedent, makes this issue ripe for review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Contact Us

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

In 1989, J. C. Bailey, III and Philip Galyen established the law firm of Bailey & Galyen. Over the years the firm expanded to provide clients with neighborhood offices in Arlington, Bedford, Brownsville, Bedford, Ft. Worth, Grand Prairie, Irving, Mesquite, Plano and Weatherford as well as four offices in Houston and three locations in South Texas, Brownsville, Harlingen and McAllen.

Today Bailey & Galyen is one of the largest consumer law practices in Texas. More than 35 attorneys and a substantial support staff have positioned our firm for continued nationwide expansion.

When you turn to Bailey & Galyen, you can count on our legal expertise and our commitment to meeting the highest ethical and legal standards.

Our firm’s size allows our lawyers to draw on significant resources, and utilize the latest technology for communications, case management, and accounting to efficiently handle our cases, no matter how complex. At Bailey & Galyen, our attorneys have built a reputation on deep commitment to personal service, dedication to client goals and steadfast protection of our clients’ legal rights.

With a solid foundation in the Texas legal community, Bailey Galyen Attorneys are active in civic organizations, local and state bar activities, and continuing legal education.